You are insane! But in a good way. Keep up the good work On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:44:18 PM UTC-4, Dennis Kane wrote: > > In my opinion, there *still* aren't any "web apps" around, hahaha :) When > I think about an "app", it's gotta look and feel just like a desktop thing. > Yeah, my project is real small right now, but I'm about to put something > up that's pretty mindblowing. It's a kind of realtime, distributed > community programming thing. I want it to be a combination of > stackoverflow + github on steroids. You'll be able to dynamically update > the Javascript that runs the site. Working code can now be deployed from > my local console text editor to the remote clients in a small fraction of a > second. It's all pretty hairy at the moment, but I should be able to > smooth things out real nice in the next few days. I'm really investigating > the possibility of an entirely new paradigm of programming... I must just > go nuts in the process, though :P!! > > On Monday, September 10, 2012 4:47:43 AM UTC-4, Daniel Sousa wrote: >> >> eyeOS used to be great on the 1.x versions, but in 2009 the eyOS Team >> abandoned the 1.x series and started developing eyeOS 2.0 almost secretly >> and since then eyeOS has been more a commercial software than an open >> source project. Currently their website doesn't even mention there's an >> open source project. >> >> Lucid 2.0 was supposed to be developed on node.js, but there was >> basically just one person around it and he hasn't worked on it for a long >> time. >> >> These desktops were a great idea 5 years ago when there weren't any web >> apps and the word "cloud" wasn't even used, now these small projects would >> have a hard time competing with Google Docs et al. >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Dennis Kane <dka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Well, the necessary technology didn't really exist years ago. I rely >>> very heavily on node/socket.io/websockets for the server side and >>> Chrome's constantly developing API in the client. Trying to implement my >>> current site with older JS engines and HTTP servers along with AJAX would >>> be next to impossible. So I'm pretty excited about what I'm doing... the >>> GUI is pretty intuitive and the websocket connection is lightening quick! >>> >>> >>> On Friday, September 7, 2012 9:35:53 AM UTC-4, Karl Tiedt wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, Lucid started years ago now, and it was very active, not sure >>>> what happened with it, but it was pretty amazing at what it did for >>>> its time.. If nothing else, it may be good for some ideas, I didnt >>>> realize it has fell by the wayside :/ >>>> >>>> -Karl Tiedt >>>> >>> -- >>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ >>> Posting guidelines: >>> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "nodejs" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en >>> >> >>
-- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
