I went through the comments given by both of you.
I am certainly at initial stage of learning Node & thus have such
questions, but I will try to learn as much as I can and use your comments
as well.
BTW : what do you think of below link ?
(
http://thecodinghumanist.com/blog/archives/2011/5/6/serving-static-files-from-node-js<https://mex07a.emailsrvr.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=0XUOyGttuk-E178ujGwQ4PWeAPyW4s9Ic5T8XNiO6uB0y_vWS3p3hQueay6fxh98syLG2dS89qU.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fthecodinghumanist.com%2fblog%2farchives%2f2011%2f5%2f6%2fserving-static-files-from-node-js>
)
Is it a good way to code in Node & if not can you point me to a better
abstraction ?
Can you please provide a working example of sample web application done in
Node which has Html + CSS + jQuery + Node script files ?
It can be just hello world in which jQuery is used in some way & the jQuery
script tag is included in index.html file.
So Node server will serve index.html file & user can interact with jQuery
code.
If you can please provide the above to me it will be of help. Thanks again.
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:05:28 PM UTC+5:30, greelgorke wrote:
>
> > Still, don't let express be the next rails.
>
> it won't, in fact with mounted apps it goes right in to opposite
> direction, you can configure every piece of your app different and split
> them on different nodes w/o changing much. there are several frameworks
> built on top of express, that want to be the next rails, but i don't like
> them much. if i want rails, i'd rather use the original. express/connect
> are inspired by sinatara, but they do not hide nodes nature away so it's a
> good way for me.
>
> > Truth be told, judging from the questions you ask and thus the views I
> expect you have, you might want to take a step backwards and try and grasp
> what node.js really is, what it can do and what it is good at. Almost
> anything is possible, but if you keep seeing node the same way as your wamp
> installation, this will stop you from understanding node. Sure, with a few
> lines of code node can act like a static file server, but thats really not
> all there is.
>
> + gazilion to this.
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2013 12:14:11 UTC+1 schrieb Geerten van Meel:
>>
>> Lets say this again: With the setup above, you have the skeletton of your
>> own webserver that behaves exactly like you want it to. With that setup, it
>> acts like a static file server and can serve anything that is in your
>> assets folder ("/static"). You start your node server instead of wamp. It
>> acts roughly the same, except that it really does serve all files in that
>> folder as-is, no php preprocessing or the like.
>>
>> Also,* there is no Jade or Stylus involved*. At all.
>>
>> If you have a webpage that runs on wamp, and does not rely on backend
>> logic (no php files),* you can copy&paste it into your static file folder
>> * and it works right out of the box. Your webserver acts like a plain
>> static file server. The setup mentioned above is what you asked for in #6.
>>
>> Note that .htaccess shenanigans are not supported, but you can do this
>> more elegantly in node anyways. To expose your api as you did using php,
>> you will need to get your hands dirty with node in the form of your own
>> route logic. express does make custom routing a bit easier on you, maybe
>> thats a better fit after all when you're starting out. You can still use it
>> without much of the extra features.
>>
>> Truth be told, judging from the questions you ask and thus the views I
>> expect you have, you might want to take a step backwards and try and grasp
>> what node.js really is, what it can do and what it is good at. Almost
>> anything is possible, but if you keep seeing node the same way as your wamp
>> installation, this will stop you from understanding node. Sure, with a few
>> lines of code node can act like a static file server, but thats really not
>> all there is.
>>
>> @Gregor: express does indeed evolve in the right direction; My initial
>> distaste when I first used it was based on its api inconsistencies and
>> conventions at a point when documentation was scarce and configuration
>> possibilities were very limited. This probably has improved by now and my
>> views in this regard are outdated. Still, don't let express be the next
>> rails.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Geerten
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 3:35:53 PM UTC+1, kanitkar...@gmail.comwrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to do the following,
>>>
>>> 1) Have regular .html .css & .js files just like a normal web app
>>>
>>> 2) Interact with Node Js only through Ajax calls
>>>
>>> 3) But All files mentioned in 1) are also hosted on the same Node Http
>>> server.
>>>
>>> So when I say http://localhost:3000/index.html, Node Js server should
>>> give me index.html along with all css & js files included in it.
>>>
>>> Then my Javascript & Ajax code should drive the functionality with Node
>>> program getting called by ajax request.
>>>
>>> Can anyone please please suggest me the best way to do this ?
>>>
>>> I don't want to use Jade or Stylus. I want to develop as if I am using
>>> tomcat or wamp server & use power of Node where ever needed only.
>>>
>>> I am aware of express js framework but don't know how it will be useful
>>> for above scenario.
>>>
>>
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
