I always followed the simple rule "callback may be called at any time" and
I was pretty happy so far.
The resulting code is more portable and simpler. Just use tail recursive
algorithms and be happy.
вторник, 20 августа 2013 г., 21:47:22 UTC+4 пользователь Bryan Donovan
написал:
>
> I have been writing node.js client code for a couple of years now, and
> have authored a couple open source libraries, but somehow I missed the memo
> telling me that I'm supposed to wrap 'synchrounous' callbacks in
> process.nextTick(). I kind-of understand why that is a best-practice, but
> what I don't understand is what the drawback is if you don't do it.
>
> For example, I write code like this all the time, and have never had a
> single problem with it:
>
> function getSomething(args, cb) {
> if (!args) { return cb(new Error('args required')); }
> if (!args.id) { return cb(new Error('args.id required')); }
>
> SomeDatabase.get({id: args.id}, cb);
> }
>
> What are the potential issues with not wrapping those arg checks in
> process.nextTick()?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
