Wow, OK.  I wasn't aware of those options.  I'll have to do some reading.

Thanks again!

- Gerry

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:29 PM, J. Liles <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ah, yes. I use the index, vid, and pid options of the snd-usb-audio module
> to ensure that all my USB MIDI devices get the same enumeration no matter
> what order they are plugged in/initialized.
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Gerry Patterson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply, I ended up travelling for a bit.  I found that
>> using a2jmidid provided better named ports that when using Jack "raw" MIDI
>> driver.  This provided more consistent operation with jackpatch restoring
>> the connections to the various devices upon session reload.  Does that
>> match your experience?  Perhaps it is because a sometimes I plug MIDI
>> devices into the computer in a different order.  Jack was creating MIDI
>> ports like MIDI_CONTROL_1, MIDI_CONTROL_2, MIDI_CONTROL_3....  Those
>> weren't always the same thing so the patches would get miss-connected.
>> With a2jmididd, the MIDI ports would be the device name so things would
>> usually match up properly.
>>
>> I reported an issue <https://github.com/original-male/non/issues/141> in
>> the tracker regarding receiving OSC messages in non-timeline.
>>
>> Thank-you and best regards,
>>
>> - Gerry
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:12 PM, J. Liles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, you can if you want. It might be helpful if you share exactly the
>>> controls you'd like to affect.
>>>
>>> a2jmidid should now longer be necessary (with recent improvements to
>>> JACK's MIDI driver). I use 'raw' personally.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Gerry Patterson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the prompt reply!  Should I file an issue?
>>>>
>>>> Is it recommended to use jack-midi 'seq' or 'raw' vs a2jmidid with
>>>> non-midi-mapper?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>
>>>> Gerry
>>>>  On Oct 1, 2014 11:03 PM, "J. Liles" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Gerry Patterson <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been fiddling attempting to get a Korg nanoKontrol2 working
>>>>>> with the Non suite.  First, I was able to get control of non-mixer 
>>>>>> (outside
>>>>>> of NSM) using mididings as documented on the wiki.  I then spent
>>>>>> considerable amount of time trying to get things working inside of NSM.  
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> eventually stumbled across a reference to non-midi-mapper which got 
>>>>>> things
>>>>>> working.  I was continuing to use mididings, but then abandoned it, in
>>>>>> favor of the remote control learning functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This controller also as a set of mute/solo/record buttons for each of
>>>>>> the 8 tracks it has faders and knobs for.  I have been able to map the 
>>>>>> mute
>>>>>> button to the mute buttons on mixer strips, but the record and solo
>>>>>> functionality seems to require sending OSC messages to non-timeline.  
>>>>>> This
>>>>>> controller also has a set of transport controls that I am itching to make
>>>>>> work as well...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does non-timeline support receiving OSC messages?  If so, is there a
>>>>>> list of example formats?  I would expect I would have to use
>>>>>> non-midi-mapper with mididings for these functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank-you and best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Gerry
>>>>>>
>>>>> Non Timeline doesn't currently support OSC control of those things.
>>>>> But it's on my TODO list. And yes, you'd need to use the midi mapper for 
>>>>> it
>>>>> then.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to