[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13594846#comment-13594846
 ] 

Billie Rinaldi commented on ACCUMULO-980:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Is there some reason the WAL encryption could not use a compression codec?

Keith, could you expand on your suggestion that a compression codec could be 
used for WAL streaming encryption?  The encryption would be much more reusable 
if we could do it all in a codec.

What do people think about the encryption codec patch attached to HADOOP-9333?  
Could that be adapted for our purposes?
                
> support pluggable codecs for RFile
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-980
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-980
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adam Fuchs
>            Assignee: Adam Fuchs
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>         Attachments: RFile-Changes-Proposal-V1.pdf
>
>
> As part of the encryption at rest story, RFile should support pluggable 
> modules where it currently has hardcoded options for compression codecs. This 
> is a natural place to add encryption capabilities, as the cost of encryption 
> would likely not be significantly different from the cost of compression, and 
> the block-level integration should maintain the same seek and scan 
> performance. Given the many implementation options for both encryption and 
> compression, it makes sense to have a plugin structure here.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to