[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15252299#comment-15252299
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-4195:
------------------------------------------

Github user ShawnWalker commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/95#discussion_r60623785
  
    --- Diff: 
test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/proxy/SimpleProxyBase.java ---
    @@ -2077,7 +2077,8 @@ public void bulkImport() throws Exception {
     
         // Write an RFile
         String filename = dir + "/bulk/import/rfile.rf";
    -    FileSKVWriter writer = 
FileOperations.getInstance().openWriter(filename, fs, fs.getConf(), null, 
DefaultConfiguration.getInstance());
    +    FileSKVWriter writer = 
FileOperations.getInstance().openWriter().ofFile(filename, fs, fs.getConf())
    +        
.withTableConfiguration(DefaultConfiguration.getInstance()).execute();
    --- End diff --
    
    Within the Accumulo source, the only time that the "default" configuration 
is the right answer is in tests.  Having `FileAccessOperations` provide the 
default configuration might make writing some tests a tad easier, but at the 
cost of making it easier to write buggy functional code.


> Generalized configuration object for Accumulo rfile interaction
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4195
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4195
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Shawn Walker
>             Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
> Taken from https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/90/files#r59489073
> On [~ShawnWalker]'s PR for ACCUMULO-4187 which adds rate-limiting on major 
> compactions, we noted that many of the changes were related to passing an 
> extra argument (RateLimiter) around through all of the code which is related 
> to file interaction.
> It would be nice to move to a centralized configuration object instead of 
> having to add a new argument every time some new feature is added to the 
> file-path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to