ddanielr commented on PR #5363: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5363#issuecomment-2699300293
Reviewed this code with @keith-turner and realized that removing this constructor actually breaks all user created table balancers that are supposed to be loaded by the TableLoadBalancer. TableLoadBalancer requires user defined balancers to have a constructor that accepts a tableId, but we do not enforce that behavior with any interface in the SPI. This is also not documented in the javadoc. Leaving this open to make javadoc updates. But these changes will need to be done in `main` and not in `2.1` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
