kevinrr888 commented on code in PR #5853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5853#discussion_r2323375816
##########
test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/WriteAfterCloseIT.java:
##########
@@ -141,12 +142,24 @@ public void testWriteAfterClose(TimeType timeType,
boolean killTservers, long ti
try (AccumuloClient c = Accumulo.newClient().from(props).build()) {
c.tableOperations().create(table, ntc);
- List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
-
- for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- futures.add(
- executor.submit(createWriteTask(i * 1000, c, table, timeout,
useConditionalWriter)));
+ int numTasks = 100;
+ List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<>(numTasks);
+ CountDownLatch startLatch = new CountDownLatch(32); // synchronize start
of a portion of the
+ // tasks
Review Comment:
I just don't see anything wrong with using a larger latch value here
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
