[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18110334#comment-18110334
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12309:
-----------------------------------------
testlens-app[bot] commented on PR #2851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2851#issuecomment-5496045882
## ✅ All tests passed ✅
🏷️ Commit: d753ae51c53fc041a5ab24959fd3cc4fabc22af4
▶️ Tests: 115257 executed
⚪️ Checks: 31/31 completed
---
_Learn more about TestLens at
[testlens.app/docs](https://testlens.app/docs/features/pr-comment/)._
> Closure calls with Object[] parameter under static compilation get the wrong
> argument
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-12309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12309
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0-alpha-1, 5.0.3, 4.0.31
> Reporter: Björn Kautler
> Assignee: Jochen Theodorou
> Priority: Major
>
> With
> {code:java}
> class Foo {
> def foo() {
> { Object[] foo -> println(foo) }.call(new Object[] { 'foo' })
> }
> }
> new Foo().foo() {code}
> you get {{[foo]}} printed.
> Adding {{@groovy.transform.CompileStatic}} it prints {{{}[[foo]]{}}}.
> Removing the {{Object[]}} with added static-compilation it again prints
> {{{}[foo]{}}}.
> The closure under static compilation should get the same parameter and not
> wrapped in another {{{}Object[]{}}}.
> This is caused by the {{call}} / {{doCall}} methods generated for the closure.
> The {{call}} call where it happens in production is a precompiled Java code
> that gives the same argument in either case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
