[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17051832#comment-17051832
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on LOG4J2-2795:
--------------------------------------------
Well the ipv4 workaround can be a doc highlighting I guess.
About dropping the plugins, the idea was to measure the cost of the
pluggability vs the cost of the earger loading. If on 1s, 800ms are taken
without any plugging there is a big issue. If plugins take 800ms then they can
be lazily loaded using a lookup convention and it would already help IMHO.
> Make LogManager/LoggerContext creation time reasonable
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-2795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2795
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.13.0
> Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: log4j2.png
>
>
> Currently (2.13), LogManager.getLogger("xxx") takes ~600ms on a cold JVM by
> itself.
> For a logging framework it is likely way too much (by comparison a CDI test
> with classpath scanning takes ~50ms).
>
> This ticket is about trying to be faster (maybe by removing java
> serialization usage and reducing registry usage + reflection of plugins by
> generating java code?).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
