rm5248 commented on a change in pull request #93:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/93#discussion_r776895762



##########
File path: src/main/cpp/aprinitializer.cpp
##########
@@ -127,3 +127,21 @@ void APRInitializer::unregisterCleanup(FileWatchdog* 
watchdog)
        }
 }
 
+void APRInitializer::addObject(size_t key, const ObjectPtr& pObject)
+{
+#if APR_HAS_THREADS
+       std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(this->mutex);
+#endif
+    this->objects[key] = pObject;
+}
+
+const ObjectPtr& APRInitializer::findOrAddObject(size_t key, 
std::function<ObjectPtr()> creator)
+{
+#if APR_HAS_THREADS
+       std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(this->mutex);
+#endif
+    auto pItem = this->objects.find(key);
+    if (this->objects.end() == pItem)
+        pItem = this->objects.emplace(key, creator()).first;

Review comment:
       We should probably check to make sure that the `creator` function is in 
fact valid first.

##########
File path: src/main/cpp/logmanager.cpp
##########
@@ -47,28 +47,19 @@ using namespace log4cxx::helpers;
 IMPLEMENT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(DefaultRepositorySelector)
 
 void* LogManager::guard = 0;
-spi::RepositorySelectorPtr LogManager::repositorySelector;
-
 
 RepositorySelectorPtr LogManager::getRepositorySelector()
 {
-       //
-       //     call to initialize APR and trigger "start" of logging clock
-       //
-       APRInitializer::initialize();
-
-       if (!repositorySelector)
-       {
-               LoggerRepositoryPtr hierarchy = Hierarchy::create();
-               RepositorySelectorPtr selector(new 
DefaultRepositorySelector(hierarchy));
-               repositorySelector = selector;
-       }
-
-       return repositorySelector;
+       auto result = APRInitializer::getUnique<spi::RepositorySelector>( []() 
-> ObjectPtr
+               {
+                       LoggerRepositoryPtr hierarchy = Hierarchy::create();
+                       return ObjectPtr(new 
DefaultRepositorySelector(hierarchy));
+               }
+       );

Review comment:
       This kinda broke my brain here.  If it is called `getUnique`, I would 
expect it to only get something, not try to also construct something.  The 
private method name(`findOrAddObject`) is much better, although perhaps the 
signature would make more sense as `getOrCreate<T>( std::function<T> create_fn 
)`?  It makes more sense to me to have the function be a parameter so that you 
know that you may or may not call it, but I don't know if other people feel the 
same way.

##########
File path: src/main/cpp/logmanager.cpp
##########
@@ -47,28 +47,19 @@ using namespace log4cxx::helpers;
 IMPLEMENT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(DefaultRepositorySelector)
 
 void* LogManager::guard = 0;
-spi::RepositorySelectorPtr LogManager::repositorySelector;
-
 
 RepositorySelectorPtr LogManager::getRepositorySelector()
 {
-       //
-       //     call to initialize APR and trigger "start" of logging clock
-       //
-       APRInitializer::initialize();
-
-       if (!repositorySelector)
-       {
-               LoggerRepositoryPtr hierarchy = Hierarchy::create();
-               RepositorySelectorPtr selector(new 
DefaultRepositorySelector(hierarchy));
-               repositorySelector = selector;
-       }
-
-       return repositorySelector;
+       auto result = APRInitializer::getUnique<spi::RepositorySelector>( []() 
-> ObjectPtr
+               {
+                       LoggerRepositoryPtr hierarchy = Hierarchy::create();
+                       return ObjectPtr(new 
DefaultRepositorySelector(hierarchy));
+               }
+       );

Review comment:
       upon further looking at it the signature is a function, but that name is 
still confusing to me.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to