[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17516345#comment-17516345
 ] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on LOG4J2-2795:
--------------------------------------------

[~mattsicker] tested master right now and got 405ms (really regular around 40x 
ms for some dozen of startups) for:

 
{code:java}
public class Run {
    public static void main(final String... args) {
        final long start = System.nanoTime();
        LogManager.getLogger(Run.class).info("foo");
        final long end = System.nanoTime();
        System.out.println(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(end - start) + "ms");
    }
} {code}
 

> Make LogManager/LoggerContext creation time reasonable
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-2795
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2795
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.13.0
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2020-03-06-08-58-21-169.png, log4j2.png
>
>
> Currently (2.13), LogManager.getLogger("xxx") takes ~600ms on a cold JVM by 
> itself.
> For a logging framework it is likely way too much (by comparison a CDI test 
> with classpath scanning takes ~50ms).
>  
> This ticket is about trying to be faster (maybe by removing java 
> serialization usage and reducing registry usage + reflection of plugins by 
> generating java code?).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to