[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3524?focusedWorklogId=787708&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-787708
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on LOG4J2-3524:
------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 04/Jul/22 23:53
            Start Date: 04/Jul/22 23:53
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: jvz commented on PR #21:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/pull/21#issuecomment-1174463905

   You got it! Do we have Jira issues for these? Or at least change log entries 
so that the next release will have up to date info?




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 787708)
    Time Spent: 0.5h  (was: 20m)

> support scala 3.0
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-3524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3524
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Scala API
>    Affects Versions: Scala 12.1
>            Reporter: PJ Fanning
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This commit - 
> [https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/commit/63584bb16ec735fb162abf22db977b2832418e62]
>  - will mean that log4j-scala will only support Scala 3.1.x and not Scala 
> 3.0.x.
> See [https://www.scala-lang.org/blog/2022/02/01/scala-3.1.1-released.html]
> ```
> Scala 3 has excellent backward compatibility guarantees between the minor 
> versions. Right now, that means that code compiled with Scala 3.1 can depend 
> on libraries published with 3.0 without any problems. The opposite, hovewer, 
> is not true. Code compiled with 3.0 is not able to read dependencies compiled 
> with 3.1. After the recent release of Scala 3.1.0, we can see that libraries 
> should be really cautious with updating the compiler version, as it forces a 
> bump on every user of that library.
> ```
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to