[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17789421#comment-17789421 ]
Piotr Karwasz commented on LOG4J2-2438: --------------------------------------- This should work with the current {{3.0.0-SNAPSHOT}} version. I am not marking it as resolved, since we currently don't systematically test it, but [log4j-samples-jlink|https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/tree/main/log4j-samples-jlink] can be tested against {{3.0.0-SNAPSHOT}} with the following invocation: {noformat} ./mvnw verify -Dlog4j2.version=3.0.0-SNAPSHOT -pl log4j-samples-jlink log4j-samples-jlink/target/maven-jlink/default/bin/java \ -m org.apache.logging.log4j.samples.jlink/org.apache.logging.log4j.samples.jlink.Main {noformat} > Using log4j-core as a module and usage in JLink > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: LOG4J2-2438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2438 > Project: Log4j 2 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.11.1 > Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > > Currently based on the given automatic modules you can't use log4j-core in a > project where you like to use jlink to produce a runtime image.. > Related to LOG4J2-2226 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)