Copilot commented on code in PR #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/22#discussion_r3064644145


##########
src/site/antora/modules/ROOT/pages/_vulnerabilities.adoc:
##########
@@ -37,7 +334,7 @@ For brevity, mathematical interval notation is used, with 
the union operator (`
 |Summary |Missing TLS hostname verification in Socket appender
 |CVSS 4.x Score & Vector |6.3 MEDIUM 
(CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N)
 |Components affected |Log4j Core
-|Versions affected |`[2.0-beta9, 2.25.3)`
+|Versions affected |`[2.0-beta9, 2.25.3) ∪ [3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-beta3]`
 |Versions fixed |`2.25.3`
 |===

Review Comment:
   The `Versions affected` row for CVE-2025-68161 was updated to include Log4j 
3.0.0 pre-releases, but the description text below still says the issue affects 
versions `2.0-beta9` through `2.25.2`. Please update the description to match 
the new affected range (or make it version-neutral) to avoid publishing 
contradictory guidance.



##########
src/site/antora/modules/ROOT/pages/_vulnerabilities.adoc:
##########
@@ -29,6 +29,303 @@ Version ranges follow the 
https://github.com/package-url/vers-spec/blob/main/VER
 For brevity, mathematical interval notation is used, with the union operator 
(`∪`) to represent multiple ranges.
 ====
 
+[#CVE-2026-40023]
+== {cve-url-prefix}/CVE-2026-40023[CVE-2026-40023]
+

Review Comment:
   PR description says this change "adds 8 new CVEs", but the diff appears to 
add 7 new CVE sections and updates an existing CVE-2025-68161 entry. Consider 
adjusting the PR description wording/table heading to avoid confusion for 
reviewers and release notes.



##########
src/site/static/cyclonedx/vdr.xml:
##########
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 <bom xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
      xmlns="http://cyclonedx.org/schema/bom/1.6";
      xsi:schemaLocation="http://cyclonedx.org/schema/bom/1.6 
https://cyclonedx.org/schema/bom-1.6.xsd";
-     version="5"
+     version="6"
      serialNumber="urn:uuid:dfa35519-9734-4259-bba1-3e825cf4be06">

Review Comment:
   The BOM `version` was incremented, but the `serialNumber` remained 
unchanged. In CycloneDX, `serialNumber` is intended to uniquely identify a 
specific BOM instance; reusing it across revisions can confuse consumers that 
deduplicate/track BOMs by serial. Consider generating a new UUID for 
`serialNumber` when publishing a new BOM version (or omit `serialNumber` if you 
don’t want this behavior).
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to