ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/6#discussion_r3764415957
########## _vulnerabilities.adoc: ########## @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ We only extend this mathematical notation with set union operator (i.e., `∪`) |Summary |JDBC appender is vulnerable to remote code execution in certain configurations |CVSS 3.x Score & Vector |6.6 MEDIUM (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) |Components affected |`log4j-core` -|Versions affected |`[2.0-beta7, 2.3.2) ∪ [2.4, 2.12.4) ∪ [2.13.0, 2.17.1)` -|Versions fixed |`2.3.2` (for Java 6), `2.12.4` (for Java 7), or `2.17.1` (for Java 8 and later) +|Versions affected |`[2.0-beta7, 2.3.1) ∪ [2.4, 2.12.3) ∪ [2.13.0, 2.17.0)` +|Versions fixed |`2.3.1` (for Java 6), `2.12.3` (for Java 7), or `2.17.0` (for Java 8 and later) Review Comment: This is hard to argue since CVE-2021-44832 does not violate any property in our threat model, but if we define allowing the operator to delegate configuration of a JDBC appender to a potentially malicious LDAP server, then I guess you are right and we should restore the higher versions. ########## _vulnerabilities.adoc: ########## @@ -45,13 +45,14 @@ This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI data source names to the `java` protocol. [#CVE-2021-44832-mitigation] ==== Mitigation -Upgrade to `2.3.2` (for Java 6), `2.12.4` (for Java 7), or `2.17.1` (for Java 8 and later). +Upgrade to `2.3.1` (for Java 6), `2.12.3` (for Java 7), or `2.17.0` (for Java 8 and later). Review Comment: As above. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
