[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17748634#comment-17748634
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12813:
-----------------------------------------
I forgot to put the Jira number so here is manually
Improved: Refactor groovy folder structure and add package declaration
Removes or renames references to groovyScripts files or folders.
EditRoutingProductLink.groovy and EditFeatureCategories.groovy files no longer
exist, nor other types of files with names starting by such.
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/5be826024c310ecb9af7855e8b535daf0ff2d0a3
> Refactor groovy folder structure and add package declaration
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-12813
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12813
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 22.01.01, Upcoming Branch
> Reporter: Wiebke Paetzold
> Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
>
>
> Due to the upgrade to jdk17 all groovy Classes need a package declaration.
> To get a distinct package naming a consistent folder structure is needed.
> For example, under framework -> base -> src there is a distinction between
> main and test. Within the test folder there is again a distinction between
> groovy and Java.
> This scheme should be applied everywhere. So a src folder contains main,
> test, ... within these folders there is again a distinction between groovy
> and java.
>
> For more information visit:
> [http://groovy-lang.org/releasenotes/groovy-3.0.html#Groovy3.0releasenotes-Splitpackages]
> “The Java Platform Module System requires that classes in distinct modules
> have distinct package names. Groovy has its own "modules" but these haven’t
> historically been structured according to the above requirement. For this
> reason, Groovy 2.x and 3.0 should be added to the classpath not module path
> when using JDK9+. This places Groovy’s classes into the unnamed module where
> the split package naming requirement is not enforced.“
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
