aglinxinyuan opened a new pull request, #7619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/7619

   ### What changes were proposed in this PR?
   
   Deletes `ProgressiveUtils` and its spec — the insert/retract flag helper for 
the old progressive-sink path, whose consumers were removed long ago. Pure 
deletion, no behaviour change: **−282 lines**.
   
   All four public methods (`addInsertionFlag`, `addRetractionFlag`, 
`isInsertion`, `getTupleFlagAndValue`) have no caller outside the object's own 
spec. The marker attribute the helper is built around, 
`__internal_is_insertion`, appears nowhere else in the repository — no 
operator, no storage reader, no frontend code, no test fixture. Nothing 
produces or consumes tuples carrying that flag, so the helper is unreachable 
even indirectly.
   
   > Reviewer note: it acquired unit tests during the 2026 coverage work, which 
is why it currently looks live. The spec covers this object and nothing else, 
so it goes with it.
   
   ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
   
   Closes #7616
   
   ### How was this PR tested?
   
   Existing tests only — this PR adds none, since it removes code and the spec 
that covered it.
   
   Locally, from the repo root with Java 17:
   
   - `sbt "WorkflowExecutionService/Test/compile"` — success (main and test 
sources).
   
   Verification, re-runnable by a reviewer:
   
   ```
   git grep -n ProgressiveUtils           # only the two deleted files
   git grep -n __internal_is_insertion    # only the two deleted files
   ```
   
   ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   
   Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 5)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to