notifications  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] test(amber, 1.1): drop stale Thread.sleep(1000) after COMPLETED state [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(frontend): convert all components to standalone [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(frontend): convert RegistrationRequestModalComponent to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): convert RegistrationRequestModalComponent to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): convert RegistrationRequestModalComponent to standalone [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): convert RegistrationRequestModalComponent to standalone [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(ci): split amber tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): split amber tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): split amber tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): split amber tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): split amber tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Split amber CI tests into amber + amber-integration jobs [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(frontend): move `--code-coverage` from build.yml into test:ci script [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(frontend): move `--code-coverage` from build.yml into test:ci script [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(frontend): move `--code-coverage` from build.yml into test:ci script [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(frontend): move `--code-coverage` from build.yml into test:ci script [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(pyamber): make ExecutorManager module names process-globally unique (backport #4717 to release/v1.1.0-incubating) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pyamber, 1.1): make ExecutorManager module names process-globally unique (backport #4717 to release/v1.1.0-incubating) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pyamber, 1.1): make ExecutorManager module names process-globally unique [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Vitest migration: decouple auth.service from RegistrationRequestModalComponent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Decouple auth.service from RegistrationRequestModalComponent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Decouple auth.service from RegistrationRequestModalComponent [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Vitest migration: enable browser mode for graph-rendering specs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Enable browser mode for graph-rendering specs [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Vitest migration: tighten remaining annotations in spec files [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tighten remaining `any` annotations in spec files [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tighten remaining `any` annotations in spec files [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tighten remaining `any` annotations in spec files [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tighten remaining `any` annotations in spec files [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Vitest migration: runner switch + initial spec sweep (step 1 of #4861) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Runner switch and initial spec sweep [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Vitest migration: re-enable component specs (NgModule → standalone or module-scope fix) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Re-enable component specs (NgModule → standalone or module-scope fix) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Re-enable component specs (NgModule → standalone or module-scope fix) [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(frontend): scaffold Vitest test runner (Karma → Vitest, step 1 of N) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(frontend): scaffold Vitest test runner (Karma → Vitest, step 1 of N) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(frontend): migrate test runner Karma → Vitest [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(frontend): migrate test runner Karma → Vitest [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Migrate frontend test framework from Karma to Vitest [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Migrate frontend test framework from Karma to Vitest [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Migrate frontend test framework from Karma to Vitest [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Migrate frontend test framework from Karma to Vitest [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add documentation for changes in sql migration notification process [incubator-texera-site] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel to 0.47.0 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): drop redundant wheel pin from requirements.txt [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): drop redundant wheel pin from requirements.txt [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Upgrade `wheel` to a more current version [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove redundant wheel pin from amber/requirements.txt [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel from 0.41.2 to 0.46.2 in /amber [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel from 0.41.2 to 0.46.2 in /amber [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump wheel from 0.41.2 to 0.46.2 in /amber [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] ci(release): gate RC creation on strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci(release): gate RC creation on strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci(release): gate RC creation on strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci(release): gate RC creation on strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Gate RC creation on a strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Gate RC creation on a strict-mode build of the tagged commit [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(licensing): bump tifffile to 2026.5.2 in LICENSE-binary-python [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): bump tifffile to 2026.5.2 in LICENSE-binary-python [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): bump tifffile to 2026.5.2 in LICENSE-binary-python [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(licensing): bump tifffile to 2026.5.2 in LICENSE-binary-python [texera] via GitHub
• [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
  • [I] License-binary drift detected [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(release): drop helm chart from RC artifacts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(release): drop helm chart from RC artifacts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(release): drop helm chart from RC artifacts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(release): drop helm chart from RC artifacts [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Add HikariCP connection pool to SqlServer [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add HikariCP connection pool to SqlServer [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add HikariCP connection pool to SqlServer [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Adding a connection pool to reduce the time spent opening connection to Postgres [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(release): ship LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in docker-compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(release): ship LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in docker-compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(release): ship LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in docker-compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(release): ship LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in docker-compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(ci): give Auto Queue an `emergency` label fast-path [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): give Auto Queue an `emergency` label fast-path [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(ci): give Auto Queue an `emergency` label fast-path [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Remove helm chart tarball from the releases artifacts [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove helm chart tarball from the releases artifacts [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Include LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in docker compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Include LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in docker compose tarball [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ci): repair direct-backport-push YAML and post backport result comments [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): repair direct-backport-push YAML and post backport result comments [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): repair direct-backport-push YAML and post backport result comments [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): repair direct-backport-push YAML and post backport result comments [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ci): expand Auto Queue triggers and skip when queue head is in flight [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): expand Auto Queue triggers and skip when queue head is in flight [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): expand Auto Queue triggers and skip when queue head is in flight [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(udf): enable Python UiParameter execution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): enable Python UiParameter execution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): enable Python UiParameter execution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): enable Python UiParameter execution [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] Backup/feat UI parameter e50e29260 [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): add Scala UiParameter injection support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): add Scala UiParameter injection support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): add Scala UiParameter injection support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): add Scala UiParameter injection support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(udf): add Scala UiParameter injection support [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for workflow core types [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(amber): add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for logreplay primitives [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for checkpoint subsystem [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(amber): add unit test coverage for worker managers (Statistics/Serialization/Pause) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for worker managers (Statistics/Serialization/Pause) [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for worker managers (Statistics/Serialization/Pause) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for worker managers (Statistics/Serialization/Pause) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for worker managers (Statistics/Serialization/Pause) [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for core/executor reflection [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for core/executor reflection [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for core/executor reflection [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(workflow-core): add unit test coverage for core/executor reflection layer [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for core/executor reflection layer [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(frontend): add inert UDF UiParameter property editor support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(frontend): add inert UDF UiParameter property editor support [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(frontend): add inert UDF UiParameter property editor support [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberFIFOChannel and WorkerPort [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberFIFOChannel and WorkerPort [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberFIFOChannel and WorkerPort [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberFIFOChannel and WorkerPort [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for AmberFIFOChannel and WorkerPort [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(amber): add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for AmberMessage envelopes [texera] via GitHub
• [I] test(workflow-operator): add unit test coverage for Sklearn OpDesc registry [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add unit test coverage for Sklearn OpDesc registry [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): pin Sklearn OpDesc registry strings [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: rewrite AGENTS.md as agent-facing index [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: rewrite AGENTS.md as agent-facing index [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: rewrite AGENTS.md as agent-facing index [texera] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages