Twas brillig at 10:35:27 04.12.2009 UTC-08 when cwo...@cworth.org did gyre and gimble:
>> The only problem with Cc is that Mailman suppresses duplicate >> messages and hence there is no List-Id: on message. CW> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough CW> to be useless. Any reason not to just use something like CW> to:notm...@notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this CW> one? Automated processing. I'd go crazy to put all mailing lists' addresses to .procmailrc instead of simple sorter in sed. But it seems it's the only reliable way. CW> I think mailman defaults to not allowing messages with the CW> mailing-list address implicit (such as in a Bcc) so it seems like CW> matching the list recipient will be more reliable than hoping the CW> List-Id is always there. Yep. Unfortunately. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgpJIxAtRvcFv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
