"W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us> writes: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:39:21PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: > >> For me it's a bit odd to have a man page for a tool we don't install >> by default. Is it maybe time to "promote" nmbug-status to the >> notmuch- namespace and install it by default? > > Sounds good to me. And Gentoo has installed it (if you've set the > ‘nmbug’ USE flag [1]) since 0.11.1-r1, 2012-02-21 [2]. I'm not sure > what the new names should be. nmbug → notmuch-dtag (for distributed > tag) and nmbug-status → notmuch-report? >
I'm not sure we need to deal with both tools in lockstep. It's not like there's an actual dependence of nmbug-status on nmbug. >> That would have to be somehow tied to installing the python >> bindings; > > On Gentoo, that happens via REQUIRED_USE [3,4]. An alternative for > packaging systems without USE-flag-style flexibility would be to spin > them off into a separate project that depends on Git and notmuch's > Python bindings. > Yes, these things are easy to solve in most packaging systems, but we want notmuch to be installable from source as well. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
