On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> What we could simply have at the time being:
> 
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug.rst (or .1)
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug-status
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug-status.rst (or .1)
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config
>   devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config.rst (or .5)
> 
> (and if .rst:s, a Makefile to build the namual pages)

This is closer to my “separate project” idea [1], and works for me as
far as this series goes.  By not providing install tooling, we also
avoid David's concern about strongly linking the independent tools
[2].  I'll push something like it in a v2.

Once we land that, I may file a subsequent series renaming the scripts
and configs to something more general.  But we can hash that out in
that series' thread.

Cheers,
Trevor

[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/21535/focus=21536
     id:20151231202815.gl3...@odin.tremily.us
[2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/21535/focus=21537
     id:87d1tm46ax.fsf@zancas.localnet

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to