On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:53:03 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon at mit.edu> wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/alternative > I've spent embarrassingly little time in the emacs UI, so my opinions on > this should be taken lightly, but I feel like all of the bindings are of the > form "if W, do X and Y, otherwise do Z" and, as a result, I'm actively > afraid of what's going to happen when I hit a key. I would much prefer > bindings with simple, highly predictable behavior. I'm sure there's some > workflow for which these contextual, compound bindings are fantastic, but > other workflows wind up fighting against them.
Very true! > I don't have a specific proposal in mind, but Gmail's bindings seem like a > good model to emulate (the actions, at least; I've never been too fond of > the specific key choices). +1 And AFAIK, "Archive" does *not* mark a message as read in GMail. (see previous messages suggesting the inverse) > On Jun 29, 2011 6:40 PM, "Carl Worth" <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: Non-text part: text/html > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch at notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch Peace -- Pieter