With the workaround "if (cli!= drm->master.base)" removed in
"[PATCH v3 34/37] drm/nouveau: remove master":
Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <z...@nvidia.com>
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:37:57 +1000
Ben Skeggs <bske...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> drm->master isn't really a nouveau_cli, and is mostly just used to get
> at an nvif_mmu object to implement a hack around issues with the ioctl
> interface to nvkm.
>
> Later patches in this series allocate nvif_device/mmu objects in
> nouveau_drm directly, removing the need for master.
>
> A pending series to remove the "ioctl" layer between DRM and NVKM
> removes the need for the above-mentioned hack entirely.
>
> The only other member of drm->master that's needed is the nvif_client,
> and is a dependency of device/mmu. So the first step is to move its
> allocation out of code handling nouveau_cli init.
>
> v2:
> - modified slightly due to the addition of tegra/pci cleanup patches
> v3:
> - move nvif init below drm_dev_alloc() to avoid changing
> nouveau_name()
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 36
> ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c index
> 140e27af0d64..eb154b44c154 100644 ---
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c +++
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c @@ -209,9 +209,11 @@
> nouveau_cli_fini(struct nouveau_cli *cli) nouveau_vmm_fini(&cli->vmm);
> nvif_mmu_dtor(&cli->mmu);
> nvif_device_dtor(&cli->device);
> - mutex_lock(&cli->drm->master.lock);
> - nvif_client_dtor(&cli->base);
> - mutex_unlock(&cli->drm->master.lock);
> + if (cli != &cli->drm->master) {
> + mutex_lock(&cli->drm->master.lock);
> + nvif_client_dtor(&cli->base);
> + mutex_unlock(&cli->drm->master.lock);
> + }
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -253,10 +255,7 @@ nouveau_cli_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, const
> char *sname, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cli->worker);
> mutex_init(&cli->lock);
>
> - if (cli == &drm->master) {
> - ret = nvif_driver_init(NULL, nouveau_config,
> nouveau_debug,
> - cli->name, device,
> &cli->base);
> - } else {
> + if (cli != &drm->master) {
> mutex_lock(&drm->master.lock);
> ret = nvif_client_ctor(&drm->master.base, cli->name,
> device, &cli->base);
> @@ -626,7 +625,6 @@ nouveau_drm_device_fini(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> nouveau_cli_fini(&drm->client);
> nouveau_cli_fini(&drm->master);
> destroy_workqueue(drm->sched_wq);
> - nvif_parent_dtor(&drm->parent);
> mutex_destroy(&drm->clients_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -636,15 +634,10 @@ nouveau_drm_device_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> struct drm_device *dev = drm->dev;
> int ret;
>
> - nvif_parent_ctor(&nouveau_parent, &drm->parent);
> - drm->master.base.object.parent = &drm->parent;
> -
> drm->sched_wq = alloc_workqueue("nouveau_sched_wq_shared", 0,
> WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
> - if (!drm->sched_wq) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail_alloc;
> - }
> + if (!drm->sched_wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = nouveau_cli_init(drm, "DRM-master", &drm->master);
> if (ret)
> @@ -726,8 +719,6 @@ nouveau_drm_device_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> nouveau_cli_fini(&drm->master);
> fail_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(drm->sched_wq);
> -fail_alloc:
> - nvif_parent_dtor(&drm->parent);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -737,6 +728,9 @@ nouveau_drm_device_del(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> if (drm->dev)
> drm_dev_put(drm->dev);
>
> + nvif_client_dtor(&drm->master.base);
> + nvif_parent_dtor(&drm->parent);
> +
> kfree(drm);
> }
>
> @@ -762,6 +756,14 @@ nouveau_drm_device_new(const struct drm_driver
> *drm_driver, struct device *paren drm->dev->dev_private = drm;
> dev_set_drvdata(parent, drm);
>
> + nvif_parent_ctor(&nouveau_parent, &drm->parent);
> + drm->master.base.object.parent = &drm->parent;
> +
> + ret = nvif_driver_init(NULL, nouveau_config, nouveau_debug,
> "drm",
> + nouveau_name(drm->dev),
> &drm->master.base);
> + if (ret)
> + goto done;
> +
> done:
> if (ret) {
> nouveau_drm_device_del(drm);
