On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:37:56 +1000
Ben Skeggs <bske...@nvidia.com> wrote:

> There's various different places in the drm code that get at the
> nvkm_device via various creative (and not very type-safe) means.
> 
> One of those being via nvif_device.object.priv.
> 
> Another patch series is going to entirely remove the ioctl-like
> interfaces beween the drm code and nvkm, and that field will no
> longer exist.
> 
> This provides a safer replacement for accessing the nvkm_device,
> and will used more in upcoming patches to cleanup other cases.
> 
> v2:
> - fixup printk macros to not oops if used before client ctor
> 

What is the change in this patch series cause the NV_PRINTK marcos
to oops? Was thinking the justification of the NV_PRINTK_().

> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c |  8 +++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 16 ++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c index
> f372bf2954aa..140e27af0d64 100644 ---
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c +++
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c @@ -751,6 +751,8 @@
> nouveau_drm_device_new(const struct drm_driver *drm_driver, struct
> device *paren if (!drm) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> +     drm->nvkm = device;
> +
>       drm->dev = drm_dev_alloc(drm_driver, parent);
>       if (IS_ERR(drm->dev)) {
>               ret = PTR_ERR(drm->dev);
> @@ -888,14 +890,10 @@ static int nouveau_drm_probe(struct pci_dev
> *pdev, void
>  nouveau_drm_device_remove(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
>  {
> -     struct nvkm_client *client;
> -     struct nvkm_device *device;
> +     struct nvkm_device *device = drm->nvkm;
>  
>       drm_dev_unplug(drm->dev);
>  
> -     client = nvxx_client(&drm->client.base);
> -     device = nvkm_device_find(client->device);
> -
>       nouveau_drm_device_fini(drm);
>       nouveau_drm_device_del(drm);
>       nvkm_device_del(&device);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h index
> 7e624c587fc0..e7d072a9a477 100644 ---
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h +++
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
> u_memcpya(uint64_t user, unsigned int nmemb, unsigned int size)
> #include <nvif/parent.h> 
>  struct nouveau_drm {
> +     struct nvkm_device *nvkm;
>       struct nvif_parent parent;
>       struct nouveau_cli master;
>       struct nouveau_cli client;
> @@ -332,18 +333,21 @@ void nouveau_drm_device_remove(struct
> nouveau_drm *); dev_##l(_cli->drm->dev->dev, "%s: "f, _cli->name,
> ##a);                \ } while(0)
>  
> -#define NV_FATAL(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK(crit, &(drm)->client, f, ##a)
> -#define NV_ERROR(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK(err, &(drm)->client, f, ##a)
> -#define NV_WARN(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK(warn, &(drm)->client, f, ##a)
> -#define NV_INFO(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK(info, &(drm)->client, f, ##a)
> +#define NV_PRINTK_(l,drm,f,a...) do {             \
> +     dev_##l((drm)->nvkm->dev, "drm: "f, ##a); \
> +} while(0)
> +#define NV_FATAL(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK_(crit, (drm), f, ##a)
> +#define NV_ERROR(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK_(err, (drm), f, ##a)
> +#define NV_WARN(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK_(warn, (drm), f, ##a)
> +#define NV_INFO(drm,f,a...) NV_PRINTK_(info, (drm), f, ##a)
>  
>  #define NV_DEBUG(drm,f,a...) do {
>           \ if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DRIVER))
>              \
> -             NV_PRINTK(info, &(drm)->client, f, ##a);
>           \
> +             NV_PRINTK_(info, (drm), f, ##a);
>           \ } while(0)
>  #define NV_ATOMIC(drm,f,a...) do {
>           \ if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_ATOMIC))
>              \
> -             NV_PRINTK(info, &(drm)->client, f, ##a);
>           \
> +             NV_PRINTK_(info, (drm), f, ##a);
>           \ } while(0)
>  
>  #define NV_PRINTK_ONCE(l,c,f,a...) NV_PRINTK(l##_once,c,f, ##a)

Reply via email to