How about SpamScud? Or maybe Spamazappa? Actually, Hormel has a published
position on the use of the term SPAM. They do not discourage it and from what
I have heard, they actually are pleased because it keeps their brand in the
current vernacular. I imagine a Lexus/Nexus search on SPAM would show
thousands of references and very few of them would refer to a meat? product.
 
On 01/27/03 1:24pm you wrote...
>SpamManager sounds more corporate, but I want something *tough*, like
>SpamFryer ;-)
>
>Seriously, I think SpamManager is about as good as AntiSpam.
>
>One random thought I've had is wondering if/when Hormel gets touchy about
>the "Spam" being used in a variety derisive product names (spamkiller,
>antispam, etc.).  I know trademark only covers you in the same industry
>(e.g., Jameson Hotels & Jameson Whiskey can both legally exist), but it
>seems like at some point there's going to be a backlash against the slang
>use of spam.
>
>-Bill
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn
>Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:09 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Opinions Please
>
>
>
>What do you think of simply CYBERsitter SpamManager? We also own
>spammanager.com.
>
>-Brian
>
>On 01/27/03 10:46am you wrote...
>>1) I'd go with "CYBERSitter AntiSpam", the NicerMail just sounds like it
>>belongs on a desktop, not a server.  The CYBERSitter AntiSpam captures both
>>the spam and adult blocking features.
>>
>>2) (Sending off list).
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Bill Naber
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn
>>Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:11 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [NoXMail] Opinions Please
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>Actually I have 2 things...
>>
>>Item 1. It looks like the name "No-X-Mail" is out which is no surprise to
>>me.
>>I write software ok, but marketing is not my best thing. We received some
>>research materials back and that name has a definite problem in that
>>"CYBERsitter" already has recognition for adult oriented material, and the
>>"No-X-Mail" makes it appear that the product is strictly for adult
>messages,
>>not necessarily spam in general.
>>
>>So it's down to "CYBERsitter AntiSpam" or "CYBERsitter NicerMail". We
>>already
>>own the nicermail.* domains. That's a plus. If you do a google search on
>>CYBERsitter AntiSpam you still get hits from a product we published in
>1998.
>>That's a negative. The research indicated that the NicerMail name imparts a
>>more "friendly" implication. We have used "For a Family Friendly Internet"
>>as
>>a service mark for many years. It's on all our t-shirts and everything ;-)
>>Also, the nicermail.com will also be used for filtered subscription email
>>services we will be offering to our regular CYBERsitter customers. My
>>opinion
>>is that NicerMail maybe does not imply something as "industrial strength"
>as
>>mail admins may want.
>>
>>So... opinions anyone?
>>
>>Item 2. I will be posting a release candidate version next week. The
>>NoxAnalyxe.exe program is now NoxAdmin.exe (of course the names may now
>>change). It is really cool now. There are no more popup menus, everything
>is
>>all hyperlinked, color coded, and you can use the whole thing with just a
>>mouse unless you want to edit a file. You can view or edit any file,
>deliver
>>held messages, and do pretty much anything from any computer anywhere. If
>>anyone wants to use it before next week, let me know.
>>
>>The licensing mechanisms have changed and now require a license code and a
>>separate key code. So before you can install the upcoming version I will
>>need
>>to issue you new codes. The key code is keyed on your server IP address. So
>>if
>>you will send me (off-list if you like) your server IP address I will send
>>you
>>each your own codes. If your server has more than one IP address, just send
>>me
>>one of them, it doesn't matter which one, as long as it is valid for IMail.
>>
>>Thanks and have a good weekend.
>>
>>-Brian
>>
>>
>>---
>>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software]
>>
>>
>>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/
>>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>l.com
>>
>>---
>>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software]
>>
>>
>>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/
>>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software]
>
>
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/
>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>l.com
>
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software]
>
>
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/
>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software]


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/
Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to