I've seen some code in the CVS somewhere that partially implemented these
functionalities


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Martina Umlauft
> Sent: quinta-feira, 16 de Março de 2006 11:30
> To: David Fuste; David Fuste
> Cc: NS-users; NS-users
> Subject: Re: [ns] Supporting infrastructure WLANs in NS2
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> look for the NOAH (Non-Ad-Hoc) routing module for ns-2. With this you
> can prevent wireless nodes from talking directly with each other; iow.
> you can force them to go through the BS and have an infrastructure
> network.
> 
> I do not know of any module that implements Association/Disassociation
> overhead or scanning. Also, there has been some critique on the phy
> models lately - you have to think about how exact a phy model you really
> need.
> 
> HTH, Martina
> 
> David Fuste schrieb:
> > I will understand no reply as no support for infrastructure WLANs in
> NS2.
> > Moreover, I have found this text in google:
> >
> > Bugs in NS2
> > Simulators always need assumtions to make their calculations viable.
> > However, when some assumptions are crucial in your simulations, you must
> > be careful. For example, there is no scanning for WLAN
> > (Discovery/Select/Authentication/Association) in NS-2, mobile nodes are
> > associated with their BS automatically if they have the same pre-defined
> > domain. If you want to study the overhead of scanning, you should make
> > your extension.
> >
> > ...but also I have found this in a IEEE paper:
> >
> > Abstract—This paper presents an analytic model for computing the
> > capacity of an infrastructure IEEE 802.11 WLAN enhanced with the support
> > of the bidirectional MAC
> > frame aggregation...Simulations with ns2 are performed and the
> > simulation results show that ...
> >
> > So, it seems someone has performed some work in this area.
> > Please, Does someone know about the existence of works in this area?
> > Thank you!
> >
> > David Fuste wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I just want to know if there is already support for simulating
> >> infrastructure WLANs in NS2 or nowadays, NS2 only supports ad-hoc
> WLANs.
> >> All wireless examples in the NS2 package are based in ad-hoc WLANs,
> even
> >> in the wired-cum-wireless scenario, where communication between
> wireless
> >> nodes takes place directly between them, using an ad-hoc routing
> >> protocol (AODV,...) instead of using the base station or access point
> as
> >> intermediate node.
> >> Moreover, these wireless nodes don't simulate
> assosiation/authentication
> >> messages to the base station  as is defined in the IEEE 802.11
> standard.
> >> Beacons,...
> >>
> >> I think it is a big drawback if NS2 doesn't have support to
> >> infrastructure WLANs. And before start to "implement" it in a simple
> >> version, I want to know if there is already some work in this area.
> >> Thank you very much!
> >>


Reply via email to