I am not sure, may be because the trace formats have changed between 2.1b8 and 2.29
dhammika On 4/9/06, Pooja Vyavahare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi Dhammika, > > Thank you very much for your suggestion... its working now.... but still > one problem remains... to get the information from trace file when u run > command to generate /RESULTS/odmrp_totals_output > , though the file will be created the error is like: > > CBR Logging error > f 199.137189980 _2_ ODM --- 6267 cbr 64 [0 ffffffff 7 800] ------- > [3:32769 32769:32769 253 0] [491] 2 0 > > CBR Logging error > f 199.138245829 _10_ ODM --- 6267 cbr 64 [0 ffffffff 5 800] ------- > [3:32769 32769:32769 253 0] [491] 2 0 > > CBR Logging error > f 199.139572899 _12_ ODM --- 6267 cbr 64 [0 ffffffff 5 800] ------- > [3:32769 32769:32769 253 0] [491] 2 0 > > CBR Logging error > f 199.141472525 _6_ ODM --- 6267 cbr 64 [0 ffffffff 7 800] ------- > [3:32769 32769:32769 253 0] [491] 2 0 > I just now encountered with this problem & will try to find out the > solution... if u have any suggestion or solution please reply me asap... > tomorrow i have to some results to my guide.... > > Once again thank you very much, > > regards, > Pooja. > > > > On 4/10/06, Dhammika Pathirana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Pooja, > > > > This is because the receiver end aborts on receiving data. Replace the > > CBR agent > > on the receiver's side with a Null agent in mcast-create-sink... in > > odmrp.tcl. > > > > dhammika > > > > > > On 4/9/06, Pooja Vyavahare < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > hello, > > > > > > i am working on ODMRP(ns2.1b8 version) on 2.28.The compilation is fine. > But > > > while running the simulation, it ends abruptly without giving any error. > > > last few lines of the trace files are : > > > M 30.27857 21 (269.38, 40.93, 0.00), (386.44, 48.62), 17.26 > > > > > > M 30.47045 77 (164.58, 646.72, 0.00), (735.45, 395.72), 18.56 > > > > > > M 31.28832 58 (888.28, 784.47, 0.00), (249.82, 653.35), 19.77 > > > > > > M 31.63425 60 (396.21, 794.28, 0.00), (85.51, 343.65), 9.67 > > > > > > M 32.57394 70 (985.64, 107.98, 0.00), (1198.89, 510.20), 6.00 > > > > > > M 32.91030 34 (723.54, 306.36, 0.00), (1185.21, 567.20), 14.59 > > > > > > M 32.93423 18 (1036.63, 279.64, 0.00), (565.11, 566.46), 7.35 > > > > > > M 34.28224 13 (620.69, 509.52, 0.00), (925.03, 556.60), 1.53 > > > > > > M 34.43171 91 (868.13, 312.77, 0.00), (600.44, 133.34), 15.69 > > > > > > M 35.16413 16 (338.30, 299.26, 0.00), (1041.14, 750.03), 9.60 > > > > > > M 35.47205 71 (243.27, 16.61, 0.00), ( > > > > > > I can't understand why its happening. is it because of the memory > shortage? > > > please send suggestions or comments if any body has faced this type of > > > problem... its urgent. > > > > > > thank you, > > > > > > Pooja. > > > > > > >
