Yes Imran, "Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems." this is the point
but if we cannot depend on morality, as Leo suggests the answers should be forward to all with a certain tag.. *No Individual answers*? with me? let's set the rule On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Imran khan <imrankhan1...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > Adding to the Leo's point I would say that the main aim of this mailing > list is to guide NS2 users and help them solve their problems that they are > facing. It becomes very difficult when the students want their assignments > and projects done by other people. I have had fair share of mercy appeals > for such kindness, which I am not willing to do. > Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person > should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the > solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Imran Khan > > Research Engineer > > Network and Service Architecture Lab > > Institute Telecom, Telecom SudParis, CNRS Lab UMR5157 > > 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France > > > +33 (0) 6 10 91 00 63 > http://www.about.me/imrankhan1984 > > > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Leo Sánchez <sanc...@ugr.es> wrote: > >> >> I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. >> But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's >> mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For >> example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something >> that you can just search in any simple tutorial. >> >> When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he >> domonstrate that haven't search anything. >> By the way, I think this list is for more "elaborate" questions, so I >> answer that questions when I have the answer. >> >> Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can >> dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. >> Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to >> improve our list! >> >> Regards! >> Leo Sánchez >> >> PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be >> misunderstood. >> >> >> El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: >> > I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition >> :) >> > Jazak Allah kheran >> > >> > how can we set this rule?! is here admins? >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBC<teera...@ece.ubc.ca> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one >> >> more rule to add: "Put a tag [NS-ANS: ....] in front of the subject >> for the >> >> answer". >> >> >> >> Best >> >> Teerawat >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: >> >> >> >> As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking >> >> process! >> >> we have two ways: >> >> 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding >> the >> >> detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). >> >> 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all >> not >> >> in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them >> we >> >> can get the full answer). >> >> else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions >> with >> >> no answers! >> >> and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) >> >> >> >> it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBC<teera...@ece.ubc.ca> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, >> people >> >>> use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer >> really >> >>> solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial >> >>> answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This >> forces >> >>> the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing >> list >> >>> exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if >> they >> >>> are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> Teerawat >> >>> On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi every body (salam) >> >>>> I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) >> >>> the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will >> >>> forward to group, and then all it's users. >> >>>> I think it must be like that in ns-users group! >> >>>> >> >>>> with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ________________________________ >> >>>> From: Mariam A. Moustafa<elansary....@gmail.com> >> >>>> To: ns-users@ISI.EDU >> >>>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM >> >>>> Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, >> in >> >>> our >> >>>> archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with >> >>> thier >> >>>> answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of >> expert >> >>> and >> >>>> active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we >> need >> >>> to >> >>>> arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an >> >>> initial >> >>>> suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the >> >>> person >> >>>> who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the >> >>>> responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. >> >>>> depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks >> >>> Mariam >> >>> >> >> >> >> >