Dear Richard,

Thanks for the support and fair assessment of what happened at the Monday 
meeting. I am afraid that Barry has his own axe to grind and cross to bear?and 
in trying to support his idea I have fallen foul of his antagonism against me 
again when I was trying to build a bridge between him and myself.


The original intention of the Monday meeting when I initiated it thirty years 
ago now was to use it as a group instructional session as in the workshops that 
are part of the current pipng courses and I still see that as part of the 
reason for having the Monday meeting. The numbers attending these meetings vary 
throughout the year and this last meeting was most likely affected by the 
aftermath of the flooding and being in a new venue. If we attract ten percent 
of the local population of about two hundred pipers this works out over the 
year what we get to our meetings on both the Monday and the Saturday and is not 
a bad turnout.


Colin R










-----Original Message-----

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu

Sent: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 23:22

Subject: [NSP] Re: solo vs. group playing





Hello All,    In respect of the postings by Colin and Barry:    I really don't 
want to get involved in what is clearly a fairly   fundamental and personal 
disagreement, but I was at the Morpeth meeting   last night and I feel I need 
to clarify something.    Colin offered the opportunity for solo playing; the 
offer was accepted   by consent of the group and only those who wanted to do so 
did in fact   play.  There was no pressure whatsoever to play, and that was   
completely clear to everyone.  I thought the offer was a fair one, and   Colin 
also made it clear from the outset that no criticism would be   made.    The 
offer was such that I was motivated to play, although I would   normally shun 
of the idea of solo or competitive playing as I would   shun a specimen of 
Rattus Rattus who had just stepped ashore and   announced that he had a few 
boils and a bit of a cough.    One person specifically asked for comment, 
before playing, and   explained their reason for doing so.  Th!
 e subsequent comment was   constructive, fairly given and carefully justified. 
 The rest of those   who played received nothing but uncritical acceptance and 
tacit   encouragement for playing.    Richard            See your new look 
Tiscali Homepage - http://www.tiscali.co.uk    
___________________________________________________        To get on or off 
this list see list information at  
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


________________________________________________________________________
AOL Email goes Mobile! You can now read your AOL Emails whilst on the move. 
Sign up for a free AOL Email account with unlimited storage today.

--

Reply via email to