Nope.  Winter Olympics has done away with viewers choice

On 20 February 2010 17:08, Paul Taylor <taylorpau...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>  I trust we are on Viewers Choice?
>
> ------------------------------
> From: to...@hotkey.net.au
>
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NSWolves]
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:15:22 +1100
>
>
>  Let’s just beat chelski tonight and shut everybody up.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Mark Worrall
> *Sent:* Saturday, 20 February 2010 11:37 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]
>
>
>
> Totally agree Jeremy. If its ok for the top clubs (Man Utd, Arsenal, etc…
> they do it all the time) to field a second strength team for cup matches
> because they know they’ll probably win anyway, why isn’t it ok for clubs
> with lesser teams to field second strength teams because they know they will
> probably lose anyway?  And save their players for the matches they have a
> serious chance of winning. We all accept it is a squad game now anyway. MM
> will be judged (by the judgemental types) entirely on whether we stay up, so
> smart tactics I say. Don’t know what all the whingers are whinging about.
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
> *Sent:* Saturday, 20 February 2010 3:14 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]
>
>
>
> Is there one rule for the big few and another for the rest?
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Friday, 19 February 2010 8:59 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]
>
>
>
> Makes my blood boil.  How have these people got into the position of
> running an institution of this importance?
>
> On 19 February 2010 08:11, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
> wrote:
>
> Absolute disgrace, but it's good to see that there is a lot of sympathy for
> Wolves out there.  Some good comments on this thread:
> http://therepublikofmancunia.com/sticking-up-for-wolves-over-premier-leagues-ridiculous-e20-decision/
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
> *Sent:* Friday, 19 February 2010 8:03 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [NSWolves]
>   From yesterday's Fiver........
>
> *WHOSE RULE IS IT ANYWAY?* As anyone stupid enough to listen to what
> Richard Scudamore has to say will know, the people in charge of football are
> making it up as they go along. Chancers to a man, they're flagrantly winging
> it, taking the game in various different directions – down the pan, up its
> own jacksie, into administration – without an effing clue what they're
> actually trying to achieve in the long run. The long what?
> Take the goons on the Premier League board, who have given Wolverhampton
> Wanderers a suspended £25,000 fine for fielding a Tea Lady XI at Old
> Trafford in December. Despite parking the canteen in front of goal, Doris,
> Irene, Edna, Nora, Edith, Ada, Chris Iwelumo, Myrtle, Sylvia and Blanche
> couldn't keep Manchester United out, losing 3-0, and now the game's
> governing body has come down on them like a big plate of iced buns.
> "The board deemed that the club had failed to fulfil its obligations to the
> league and other clubs in the utmost good faith and was therefore in breach
> of Rule B13," were the first words muttered in today's improv workshop. "The
> board had sympathy for the explanation submitted by the club in relation to
> similar cases from previous seasons," continued the least amusing
> off-the-cuff riff performed since Greg Proops and Josie Lawrence were
> mainstays of Channel 4's Friday night schedule. "However the board ruled
> that this case could be differentiated from the other matches cited and that
> disciplinary action was warranted."
> Exactly how they differentiated Wolves' Tea Lady XI from, say, Manchester
> United's Knackered Old Geezers Who Clean Out The Old Trafford Bogs In
> Exchange For Free Carling Cup Tickets XI that faced Hull on the final day of
> last season – Bert, Arthur, Les, Ernie, Tosh, Norm, Roy, Gary Neville, Bill,
> George and Len - wasn't explained. "You have to be realistic," said Premier
> League chief executive Scudamore at the time. "United have got a squad, and
> therefore you can't argue that they deploy the benefit of that squad. Alex
> Ferguson's going to put a team out that he intends to win that game." Eh?
> Why didn't United get... or why have Wolves been... er... oh. Oh! The Fiver
> is confused. Not as confused as Scudamore and pals, admittedly, but confused
> nonetheless.
>
>
>  Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient.
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>  The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
> Macquarie.
>
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>
>
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
> ------------------------------
> Browse profiles for free! View photos of singles in your 
> area.<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/>
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>

-- 
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

Reply via email to