Sorry Steve, that explains it.
I can see how BTMO Marcus would love to see Halford streaking down the wing
mesmerizing his full back!
They must put something in the Macquarie Bank tea?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 1:04 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Well he has played in that position so he was an option I listed. Marcus
wanted to play him on the wing, not me
On 15 October 2010 12:43, Paul Crowe <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:
What are you on Steve?
Halford a Winger?
He's not even good enough to play our "Hoof Ball" game.
I'd rather your Nan play than him!!
Hoping the Hammers play crap and we sneak a win.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 3:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Hunt is a hard tacker though. He smashed Cech's skull in.
We're easy to read with only one winger. Halford maybe. After a dire game
of football I could see us nicking a header from a long throw.
The likelihood is that if we lose this we'll lose nin on the trot. What's
the record number of matches that a manager has lost and kept his job?
On 14 October 2010 14:26, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:
If we're going down, we may as well go down with a fight and live up to our
misguided tag of being "dirty".
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:25 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Now, now Marcus, you can't be encouraging hard tackling. Danny Murphy would
not be happy with you.
_____
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Not sure he's worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle. I'd
rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is expendable) put
into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury because he isn't
match fit. Better to preserve him for Championship football where he has
proven pedigree ;-)
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 1:41 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [BTMO] Hunt
Played 45 minutes in the reserves.
Do we risk him in the team on the right wing this weekend? If not who do we
play on the right?
Bia?
Edwards?
Halford?
Fletcher / Doyle?
Jarvis on the right with Van Damme on the left? No!
I assume Mancienne will take Henry's role, with either Jones or Milijas. If
we play five in midfield then Edwards will probably be the third central
midfielder so we still need some attacking threat on the right.
Big decisions this weekend. Anything less than three points and we're in
the poo.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
