Don't forget I only suggested Halford In preference to risking Hunt against the
'ammers.
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:42:33 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Yes, we should try to get down to ten men as soon as possible.
On 15 October 2010 13:31, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
Read my comments Paul. I want him purely to rough up the opponent (he
doesn't have a silky skills)
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:10:09 2010
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Sorry Steve, that explains it.
I can see how BTMO Marcus would love to see Halford streaking down the
wing mesmerizing his full back!
They must put something in the Macquarie Bank tea?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 1:04 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Well he has played in that position so he was an option I listed.
Marcus wanted to play him on the wing, not me
On 15 October 2010 12:43, Paul Crowe <pcr...@contechengineering.com>
wrote:
What are you on Steve?
Halford a Winger?
He’s not even good enough to play our “Hoof Ball” game.
I’d rather your Nan play than him!!
Hoping the Hammers play crap and we sneak a win.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 3:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Hunt is a hard tacker though. He smashed Cech's skull in.
We're easy to read with only one winger. Halford maybe. After a dire
game of football I could see us nicking a header from a long throw.
The likelihood is that if we lose this we'll lose nin on the trot.
What's the record number of matches that a manager has lost and kept his job?
On 14 October 2010 14:26, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:
If we’re going down, we may as well go down with a fight and live up to
our misguided tag of being “dirty”.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:25 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Now, now Marcus, you can't be encouraging hard tackling. Danny Murphy
would not be happy with you.
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Not sure he’s worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle.
I’d rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is expendable) put
into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury because he isn’t match
fit. Better to preserve him for Championship football where he has proven
pedigree ;-)
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 1:41 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [BTMO] Hunt
Played 45 minutes in the reserves.
Do we risk him in the team on the right wing this weekend? If not who
do we play on the right?
Bia?
Edwards?
Halford?
Fletcher / Doyle?
Jarvis on the right with Van Damme on the left? No!
I assume Mancienne will take Henry's role, with either Jones or
Milijas. If we play five in midfield then Edwards will probably be the third
central midfielder so we still need some attacking threat on the right.
Big decisions this weekend. Anything less than three points and we're
in the poo.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed
are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken
transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised
alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the
RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from
your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part
of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
