So we should sack Mick on the basis that Morgan has someone great in the wings? All I ask for is a couple of names. The pool of qualified football managers is not that vast and it's all conducted in public so who should it be?
There's a fella at Cardiff called Jones. He's a successful lower league manager. Maybe we should get him in. On 18 October 2010 14:26, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote: > I’ve always had an issue with MM and his selection policy (playing people > out of position and preferring hard work over ability) but I have also given > credit when we have put in good performances. If you believe the current > run of abject performances combined with a puzzling selection/recruitment > policies is the way that you want our club to be run then you clearly have > lower expectations or standards than I. Yes he presents a funny post match > conference but that’s just a ploy to distract people from the dire > performances that he has overseen. > > > > As mere armchair supporters stranded in the Antipodeans how could we > possibly comment on who an astute business man such as Morgan has > connections to. We automatically assume that we have to have someone of > vast experience to make us successful. By way of example only, our dear > friends The Baggies appointed Roberto Di Matteo with only 1 year of > managerial experience under his belt. He won promotion in his first season > and has a team playing attractive attacking football in the premier league. > The unfancied Blackpool appointed a manager who is almost certifiable and > has no previous record of success, yet he has managed to mould a team that, > so far, has been successful playing attacking football. Even if both these > teams to do end up getting relegated at the end of the season, I’m sure > their fans will have enjoyed the season much more than ourselves who are > likely to achieve the same result (relegation) but only after suffering a > season with a complete lack of creativity or attacking intent. > > > > We don’t know what Morgan’s master-plan is. I’m fairly sure that even if > he had people in mind to come and manage the club, we would be the last to > hear about it, but all I’m saying is it doesn’t necessarily need to be a big > name who we can look to statistics to demonstrate whether he is “better” or > not that Thick Mick. > > > > I have faith that Morgan is a good businessman. Wolves and Premier League > football is a business. Let’s hope he makes the right business decisions > before it is too late. > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 1:59 PM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell? > > > > All managers get sacked or quit and Mick will at some point. You'll then > be able to say "I've told you for the last four years he was no good. I > told you when we won the Championship and stayed in the Premiership that he > was no good." > > > > Many other people have been quite happy with Mick over the last few years. > I must admit I'm unhappy about our position and I can see why people are > turning against him. However, I stand by these two points: > > > > (a) Statistical evidence that changing managers has no impact on > performance over a season. > > (b) The absence of a credible alternative to come to Wolves if Mick is > sacked (someone who would come and someone who would be better). > > > > There's no point debating (a) but if you can suggest an answer to be I'll > fill out my application and pay you my subs. > > > > > > > > On 18 October 2010 13:45, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Judging by the commentary on here since the West Ham game, I’d struggle to > find someone who doesn’t want to see MM out, excluding your good self ;-) > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 1:42 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell? > > > > Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. You happen to be right at the > moment but arguably haven't been right for the last four years as Wolves > have progressed from expectations of a Championship relegation battle to a > second season in the Premier League. > > > > Paul Crowe's defection to BTMO is sexually motivated. Who else is in the > "rush of applications" that you cite? > > > > > > > > > On 18 October 2010 13:29, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Roughly one month ago (13th September) it was quoted on this list that the > BTMO doomsayers (both of us) were a splinter cell within NSWolves who must > be getting bored by the fact that we were continuing to grind out good > results. Well it seems that there has been a sudden rush of applications to > join the BTMO Club. > > > > How times have changed; are we really that fickle to suddenly decide that 4 > weeks of results has instantly made MM rubbish? > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
