I now want him to be sacked, us get a rubbish manager in, get relegated and struggle to get back up for twenty years. I shall blame all of you lot for hounding him out. And I shall do it every day on this email.
You're all responsible. On 26 October 2011 14:17, Paul Crowe <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote: > A defeat tonight, followed by another at Maine Road and Wigan at home > will see the end of MM!**** > > ** ** > > Fingers crossed! If Morgan thought some fans were hostile on Saturday, he > hasn’t seen anything yet. I remember being at the Mol for McGee’s last game, > the whole ground shook with vicious “McGee Out” chants! **** > > ** ** > > I’ve had enough of him and his excuses for the football we haven’t been > playing for a while now. ** > > * * > > Paul Crowe**** > > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific**** > > **** > > ConTech (Sydney Office)**** > > **** > > PO Box 3517**** > > Rhodes Waterside**** > > Rhodes NSW 2138**** > > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542**** > > Mob: 0406009562**** > > Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com**** > > Website: www.contechengineering.com**** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 October 2011 12:18 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > ** ** > > You've changed your argument there, but my point was is that comparing > Wolves with those sides is specious reasoning.**** > > **** > > In addressing your new argument, we have at the moment a team at the top of > the bottom quartile of the PL, which you admitted is where we should be with > the squad we have. That we haven't spent more to get a bigger squad is not > Mick's fault.**** > > On 26 October 2011 11:16, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote:**** > > Quality of players is certainly a big part of it but nobody has ever > suggested that we should be able to compete with the likes of Man City, Man > Utd, Arsenal etc, but surely Mick must take some responsibility for the > squad that he has built and the tactics that he employs.**** > > **** > > He’s spent 5 years rebuilding the team from scratch, there have been > wholesale changes behind the scenes with management and coaching staff, > introduction of more technology to monitor training and match performance. > We have a new owner that is investing in infrastructure and to some extent > players, yet what have we been able to show for it so far *this season*? > We have just been outplayed and dominated by a team in their first ever > season in top flight football, who 3 seasons ago were playing league 1 > football. We were also very poor against QPR at home and West Brom. **** > > **** > > The team that Mick built isn’t performing to the standard that many think > they should be after 3 years in the Premier League; surely Mick is largely > responsible for that? Him, Jez & Morgan said they were aiming for mid-table > this season. Do you think we are performing well enough to get mid-table? > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 9:40 PM **** > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > **** > > Is this an issue of the quality of the players more than the manager's > ability? > > For example, Silva and Milner each cost about as much as our entire team. > Silva's wages are 140k a week which is about 5 of our players. > > No. Of course not. It's all Mick's fault**** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:35 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]**** > > The glaringly obvious difference between the teams being compared is that > almost their entire 25 man squads are “complete” players than have the > ability to defend, attack, pass, cross, head a ball and cover other players > when they go wandering.**** > > **** > > Unfortunately, we don’t have 1 player in our 25 man squad who can do > anything other than play the position they were brought up to play (usually > via the lower tiers of English football).**** > > **** > > Is it any wonder that players like Silva & Milner can wonder around as they > wish when their team mates can easily slot in to any position and cover > their wondering? Can you imagine Jarvis trying to slot into right-back if > Stearman goes wondering around the pitch? Not a chance as he has no > positional awareness or ability to tackle. This is the case for almost > every position in our team. Mick is old school and buys/trains players to > perform single functions, which is why so many of them look like square pegs > in round holes when he tries to use someone to fill a position through > injury. The style of players and the coaching methods used by the newer > bread of coaches (Barca, City, Real Madrid etc) are polar opposites to the > thinking of Barnsley lad McCarthy.**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:22 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > **** > > Interesting article on "tactics".**** > > **** > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thefootballtacticsblog/2011/10/silva_and_milner_add_guts_and.html > **** > > **** > > > > **** > > On 25 October 2011 13:10, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote:**** > > No way!!! Mick McCarthy really is Mick The Magician compared to that prat > Sven. **** > > **** > > It seems Mick is going to be given the opportunity to rectify the current > slump and keep us in the Premier League so lets see whether he is smart > enough to try different tactics and team selections or whether he’s going to > be pig-headed and persist with the same drivel. If we are going to change > back to a 4-5-1 I think he needs to move Doyle into the hole behind a > striker. Doyle is good at holding up the ball and creating space for other > players but he is not a natural goalscorer (last weeks tap-in was not of his > own making).**** > > **** > > Two hammerings from Man City in a week should be a good test for the fans > and also Mick’s temperament. **** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:05 PM **** > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > **** > > I wonder if that is just a longer-term example of "he has the full support > of the board"**** > > **** > > Sven is free now. Is he the man to consolidate us?**** > > On 25 October 2011 12:45, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote:**** > > At the end of the day, I don’t think it really matters how much the fans > complain. Steve Morgan categorically stated at the start of the season that > even if Wolves were relegated, Mick would remain the manager. End of as far > as he’s concerned.**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 12:35 PM **** > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > **** > > I think the point is that an experienced footbal manager knows more about > football than anyone in the crows, although most people don't agree with > that.**** > > On 25 October 2011 08:44, LEESE Matthew <matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> > wrote:**** > > Sky must have failed to pan the crowd if the fella who wrote this believes > McCarthy was getting stick from a minority.**** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward**** > > *Sent:* Monday, 24 October 2011 8:04 PM **** > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** > > **** > > Here you are, you spotty kids. > > http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,12040_7260955,00.html**** > > "But Mick then makes a couple of substitutions and the cameras focused on a > bunch of spotty kids on the terraces. Basically their attitude was 'you > don't know what you're doing' - foul-mouthed abuse of these substitutions > which in fact coincided with the turning of this game in Wolves' favour.** > ** > > "Of course he knew what he was doing! Why would they be standing on the > terraces and doing some other job and Mick be a Premier League manager - a > manager of one of the top 20 clubs in one of the top football countries in > the world if he didn't know more about what he was doing than they do?**** > > "People don't know their place anymore. This is the problem. People who > don't know anything are shouting 'you don't know what you're doing' to a > chap who quite demonstrably does know football inside out."**** > > **** > > On 24 October 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:**** > > The bloke's a blowhard, his offer to fight fans was made in front of > reporters without a fan in sight. > If ever there was a time to offer someone outside it was when Keane slagged > him off to his face. > Of course he never uttered a word. > > As for a new manager I'd go for that Ferguson bloke. > He'll be after another job if his team carry on performing like they did > this morning.**** > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf**** > > Of Paul Crowe > Sent: Monday, 24 October 2011 8:32 AM**** > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] > > MM on his way out, lost the plot big time! > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers/8844 > > 020/Wolverhampton-Wanderers-manager-Mick-McCarthy-tells-fans-he-is-up-for-a- > fight-following-protests.html<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers/8844%0A020/Wolverhampton-Wanderers-manager-Mick-McCarthy-tells-fans-he-is-up-for-a-%0Afight-following-protests.html> > > Offering to fight the fans? MM has totally lost in my opinion. > > Who do you fancy as our next Manager Rog? Another one to add to the list > could be that Paul Lambert from Norwich, they have tried to play football > all season so far. > > > Paul Crowe > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific > > ConTech (Sydney Office) > > PO Box 3517 > Rhodes Waterside > Rhodes NSW 2138 > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 > Mob: 0406009562 > Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com > Website: www.contechengineering.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Rog & Reet > Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 12:44 PM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] > > Sounds like you set the alarm for the wrong time and have mistaken Norwich > for us. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Steven Millward > Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 11:40 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] > > I watched it this morning. I thought we played very well. No complaints. > Some really good performances and a lot of bad luck again. > > On 23/10/2011, at 9:45 AM, "Marcus Chantry" <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > > If you had sat and watched the match I can guarantee that your reaction > would be different Steve. I can see how waking up and seeing a 2-2 result > might be seen as a positive because it's not a loss, but trust me the two > late goals simply mask the fact that we were rubbish for 84 minutes. > > > > Molineux was about to be torn to shreds by the fans (those who were still > there) but the late goals quelled that a bit. It still can't hide the fact > that we were completely outclassed at home by a newly promoted team. It was > only the bringing on of Milijas (and some other bloke) that made any > difference and we stuck with the 442 formation with the subs. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Steven Millward [mailto:millward....@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 05:36 AM > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] > > > > It's all gone downhill since he took your advice and played 442 > > > > On 22/10/2011, at 11:43 PM, "Rog & Reet" <rognr...@exemail.com.au> > wrote: > > > >> Kept the faith even after two back passes for Hennessey to hoof upfield > >> inside the first 60 seconds. > >> Mick'll get us out of this, he knows what he's doing. > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > >> Of Marcus Chantry > >> Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 11:37 PM > >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > >> Subject: [NSWolves] > >> > >> I'm so glad Mick is our manager. Keep the faith. > >> > >> > >> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not > the > >> intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > >> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not > guarantee > >> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > >> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions > of > >> Macquarie. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This > e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the > named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged > information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any > mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any > unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed > in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily > the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please > immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not > disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended > recipient. **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This > e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the > named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged > information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any > mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any > unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed > in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily > the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please > immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not > disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended > recipient. **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
