Finally, you're making some sense. On 21 December 2011 09:07, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
> Why would we want Mick out as he’s bugger all to do with how well we > play?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Norwich**** > > ** ** > > I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still > want Mick out?**** > > On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:**** > > Why the **** were people booing after that game?**** > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf**** > > Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA > Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM > To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What an incredible last few minutes > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > > What a great match. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > > > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > > > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the > manager that made the inspired substitution > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many > halves there are in the second half. > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>> > >>>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked > the > >>>>> goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > Behalf > >>>>> Of Chantrys > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM > >>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > >>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > >>>>> > >>>>> Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>> > >>>>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing > game? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] > On > >>>>> Behalf > >>>>>> Of Chantrys > >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM > >>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only > seem > >>>>> to > >>>>>> be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as > daylight the > >>>>>> difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective > >>>>> hoof-ball > >>>>>> whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession > football, > >>>>> which > >>>>>> is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may > be > unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group > will > not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any > views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the > sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the > Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action > taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this > message. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
