Hi again,
Thank you for the explanation. The patch was commited to both branches.
Regards,
Szaka
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 5/20/08, Szabolcs Szakacsits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 May 2008, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > > It has nothing to do with distcheck.
> > >
> > > All it does it put the headers into tarball even if package was
> > > configured without library.
> >
> >
> > Hi Alon,
> >
> > I think the patch looks good but for some reason (which must be my fault)
> > I couldn't reproduce the problem.
> >
> > I tried ./configure --disable-library with 'make dist' and 'make distcheck'
> > but the package always had the headers.
> >
> > How could I check the failure scenario?
>
> Hello,
>
> You cannot... :)
>
> The "For the most part, the files to distribute are automatically
> found by Automake", so in this particular case automake create a
> variable (am__ntfs3ginclude_HEADERS_DIST). But I don't like to leave
> this for chance... This explicitly control the dist path, without
> major overhead.
>
> Your call.
>
> Alon.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
>
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
