Am 13.07.2011 12:56, schrieb Erik Larsson:
Hi Ulf,
Ulf Zibis wrote 2011-07-13 12.45:
So it seems better to use ext4 + Ext2FSD <http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsd> for Windows
access.
Any recommendations ?
Ext2FSD doesn't support journaling... so it's no better in that respect. It also doesn't fully
support Ext4 yet (extents, xattrs are unsupported).
(Also, I'm convinced that NTFS-3G is more widely tested and used than Ext2FSD. Still, I'm sure
it's a good project.)
My 1st priority is to have the safety of the journalling for my /home partition.
2nd is to have easy access to it from Windows XP.
Should I better use ext3 than ext4, also from performance/footprint reason?
(I'm running Zenwalk distro on 1 GHz Mobile Pentium III, 384 MB RAM, 15 GB HDD)
Thanks,
Ulf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric
Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup
Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas,
optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
