The remaining problem is that the bigger shape is scaled down to the size of the smaller shapes.
Sytse
Here is the source:
\setupFLOWcharts[ [ nx=1, ny=1, dx=40pt, dy=25pt, breedte=260pt, hoogte=130pt ]
\setupFLOWlines [hoek=rond, kaderkleur=blauw, pijl=ja]
\startFLOWchart[Observations] % The bigger shape
\startFLOWcell
\name{Obs}
\location{1,1}
\shape{action}
\text{{\bf observations}}
\stopFLOWcell
\stopFLOWchart
\setupFLOWcharts [ nx=3, ny=2, dx=40pt, dy=25pt, breedte=110pt, hoogte=130pt ]
\startFLOWchart[Parameters] % The smaller shapes
\startFLOWcell
\name{Obs1}
\location{1,1}
\shape{node}
\connection[bt]{CanPar}
\stopFLOWcell \startFLOWcell
\name{Obs2}
\location{2,1}
\shape{node}
\connection[bt]{Means}
\stopFLOWcell\startFLOWcell
\name {CanPar}
\location{1,2}
\shape{action}
\text{{\bf canonical\\parameters}\\$\btheta=\pmatrix{\theta_1\cr\vdots\cr\theta_n\cr}$}
\connection[-r-l]{Means}
\comment[t]{$\mu_i=h^{-1}(\theta_i)$}
\comment[b]{$=b'(\theta_i)$}
\stopFLOWcell
\startFLOWcell
\name {Means}
\location{2,2}
\shape{action}
\text{{\bf means}\\~\\$\E\Y=\bmu=\pmatrix{\mu_1\cr\vdots\cr\mu_n\cr}$}
\connection[+l+r]{CanPar}
\comment[b]{$\theta_i=h(\mu_i)$}
\connection[+r+l]{LinStruct}
\comment[t]{link function}
\comment[b]{$\eta_i=g(\mu_i)$}
\stopFLOWcell\startFLOWcell
\name {LinStruct}
\location{3,2}
\shape{action}
\text{{\bf linear structure}\\~\\$\pmatrix{\eta_i\cr\vdots\cr\eta_n\cr}={\boldmath{\eta}}=\X\bbeta$}
\connection[-l-r]{Means}
\comment[t]{$\mu_i=g^{-1}(\eta_i)$}
\comment[b]{response f.}
\stopFLOWcell
\stopFLOWchart
\startoverlay
{\FLOWchart[Parameters]}
{\FLOWchart[Observations]}
\stopoverlayAt 4/22/2004 11:02, you wrote:
\startoverlay
{... de chart ...}
{... de chart ...}
\stopoverlay
_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
