Hi Hans, Alan, Mikael, and other Feynman fans, I do think Alan's node module could do a good job with this.
> It would be nice to have a not too complicated syntax, but maybe just have > some of the > "shapes" of paths available. So, which ones are actually needed? I think the needed shapes are: - dashed or dotted paths already built into MetaPost - paths that are wiggly, zig-zag or coiled - optional arrows on the paths - optional dots or blobs at the connecting points This is plenty for someone doing Standard Model physics. Model builders doing supersymmetric, walking-technicolor, bla-bla need more, of course, but I’d let them program their own shapes. The package feynMP already has all of these paths, as well as double-line variants, coded in MetaPost. If I could use feynMP with ConTeXt, that’s what I’d do. It produces very nice diagrams. Gavin ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
