On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
I've been using it for ConTeXt, and to be honest, it works amazingly
well. It hallucinates sometimes, but it's such a time saver.
Maybe someone should try asking it to write documentation/manuals?
As a teacher, we are accustomed to seeing Google/Wikipedia/etc.
cut-and-paste nonsense; now, this nonsense appears more polished, and
our students are none the wiser. Saves them time, too! ;-)
Who said: "the best way to economize thought is not to think at all"?
Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
