On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:16:58AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:52:30PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > On 7/5/2023 6:38 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tSP:3.282
> > > > > > > THK:-1.721
> > > > > > > H__E
> > > > > > > X
> > > > > > > HK:-1.291
> > > > > > > SP:3.282
> > > > > >
> > > > > > no MWE includes so clueless
> > > > >
> > > > > \starttypescript[mylucidaserif]
> > > > > \definefontsynonym[LucidaBrightRegular]
> > > > > [file:LucidaBrightRegular]
> > > > > \definefontsynonym[LucidaBrightItalic]
> > > > > [file:LucidaBrightItalic]
> > > > > \definefontsynonym[LucidaBrightDemiBold]
> > > > > [file:LucidaBrightDemiBold]
> > > > > \definefontsynonym[LucidaBrightDemiItalic]
> > > > > [file:LucidaBrightDemiItalic]
> > > > > \stoptypescript
> > > > Hm, isn't that this lucida rip off again? Maybe bad metricks then but
> > > > I'm
> > > > not going to look into that as the official TUG lucida opentype fonts
> > > > perform okay.
> > > >
> > > > Hans
> > >
> > > The first sentence is irrelevant. And a guess. Bad metrics is not the
> > > culprit
> > >
> > > if it were true, the same problem would be under lualatex, correct?
> >
> > well, who knows what (me)tricks those fonts have embedded .. are these the
> > official TUG lucida open type fonts? if so,
> >
> > \setupbodyfont[lucida]
> >
> > should just work (btw, you also don't set up math)
> >
> > > But it's not there.
> > I can't (and won't) check that as I don't have (lua)latex installed nor have
> > those fonts. I also don't see where this \qquad is in your example.
>
>
> Using the same fonts under lualatex yields \TeX\ without an issue.
>
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \usepackage{unicode-math}
>
> \defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=TeX}
>
> \setmainfont[
> ItalicFont=LucidaBrightItalic,
> BoldFont=LucidaBrightDemiBold,
> BoldItalicFont=LucidaBrightDemiItalic,
> ]{LucidaBrightRegular}
> %
> \setsansfont[
> ItalicFont=LucidaSansOblique,
> BoldFont=LucidaSansDemiBold,
> BoldItalicFont=LucidaSansDemiOblique,
> ]{LucidaSansRegular}
> %
> \setmonofont[
> % ItalicFont=LucidaTypewriterOblique,
> BoldFont=LucidaTypewriterBold,
> % BoldItalicFont=LucidaTypewriterBoldOblique,
> ]{LucidaTypewriterRegular}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> {\rm \input{knuth}}
>
> \textsf{\input{knuth}}
>
> \end{document}
>
> >
> > As for the \showmakup ... it is used extensively and afaiks there are no
> > issues with it.
>
> After running lualatex the problem dissappears. Or it seems like it.
>
I take it back. It doesn't disappear. It's still there. \showmakeup
yields the right readings but yet the kerning is off on \TeX\.
With \showmakeup everything ‹seems› correct. I guess the readings
output are correct, and also, amazingly, the horizontal kerning,
as you aptly named it, for \TeX\
Not under lualatex. Everytihng seems fine there.
But I perfectly understand that there would not be any support for these
fonts. Thanks though!
(trying to send this message with an attachment as before but it wouldn't
go through)
--
We are experiencing system trouble -- do not adjust your terminal.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
