Hi,

thank you, that answers all my questions!

Gerion

Am Mittwoch, 28. August 2024, 00:03:34 MESZ schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
> Gerion Entrup schrieb am 27.08.2024 um 23:29:
> > Am Dienstag, 27. August 2024, 22:30:16 MESZ schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
> >> Gerion Entrup schrieb am 27.08.2024 um 21:28:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I played around with different fonts, especially Bitstream XCharter and 
> >>> Overpass (http://overpassfont.org/) and wanted to combine them.
> >>> However, I see some issues regarding ligatures, kerning and 
> >>> obliques/italics.
> >>>
> >>> Here is a minimal example:
> >>> ```
> >>> \definefontfeature[default][mode=node, kern=yes, liga=yes]
> >>> % more features
> >>> % [mode=node, kern=yes, liga=yes, tlig=yes, itlg=yes, ccmp=yes, 
> >>> language=dflt, protrusion=quality, expansion=quality]
> >> There is no need to set default features like ligatures and kerning, the
> >> better alternative here is to use
> >>
> >>       \definefontfeature [default] [default] [protrusion=quality,...]
> >>
> >> which adds additional settings to the default set.
> >>
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][roman][xcharter]
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][sansserif][overpass][rscale=0.93]
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][teletype][overpass][rscale=0.93]
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][mono][overpassmono][rscale=0.93]
> >>> \definetypeface   [myfont][mathematics][math] [xcharter]
> >>>
> >>> \setupbodyfont[myfont, 11pt]
> >>>
> >>> \startTEXpage
> >>>
> >>> \showfontkerns
> >>>
> >>>                Vitae, Vase, LT, VA, Y., Effizient, abcdel™, \italic{effi 
> >>> abcdel™}, \slanted{effi abcdel™}\\
> >>> \style[sans]{Vitae, Vase, LT, VA, Y., Effizient, abcdel™, \italic{effi 
> >>> abcdel™}, \slanted{effi abcdel™}}\\
> >>> \style[mono]{Vitae, Vase, LT, VA, Y., Effizient, abcdel™, \italic{effi 
> >>> abcdel™}, \slanted{effi abcdel™}}\\
> >>>
> >>> \showbodyfont[myfont]
> >>>
> >>> \stopTEXpage
> >>> ```
> >>> It produces the PDF in the attachment. I'm struggling with several things:
> >>> - xcharter seems to have no kerning applied. It is listed as font 
> >>> feature, though. Is it correct to have no kerning at all for that font?
> >> The font has kerning information but none for characters in the ASCII 
> >> range.
> > Good to know. Especially for the "Va" in "Vase", I expected kerning (it 
> > looks not equally spaced currently).
> >
> >
> >>> - xcharter also have no ligatures (at least it doesn't look like that). 
> >>> That is listed as font feature, too, although only for italic and 
> >>> slanted. According to https://tug.org/FontCatalogue/xcharter/ there are 
> >>> ligatures in the font.
> >> There are ligatures for ff[il].
> > They are defined in the font, but they are not used in the PDF output, 
> > aren't they? For example in the "ffi" in "Effizient" the "f" is not 
> > connected with the "i", while the ligature glyph has a connection there.
> 
> You have to change the value of the script tag because the don't set 
> them for the dflt script.
> 
> \definefontfeature[default][default][script=latn]
> 
> \definefontfamily[myfont][rm][xcharter]
> 
> \setupbodyfont[myfont]
> 
> \showmakeup[glyph]
> 
> \starttext
> 
> ff fi fl ffi ffl fb fh fk
> 
> \feature[-][ligatures]
> 
> ff fi fl ffi ffl fb fh fk
> 
> \stoptext
> 
> > I attached a screenshot for comparison. The ligature was generated with 
> > "\ShowCompleteFont{name:xcharter*default}{11pt}{1}" (with the fnt-10 
> > module).
> > It is, however, noticeable that the whole xcharter font is thicker in the 
> > output of \ShowCompleteFont. Is this part of the reason?
> 
> When you load a font by name use one which is listed in the table you 
> get with "mtxrun --script fonts --list --all  --pattern=xcharter*". In 
> this case the table is
> 
> identifier            familyname         fontname 
> filename                   subfont   instances
> 
> xcharterbold          xcharter           xcharterbold XCharter-Bold.otf
> xcharterbolditalic    xcharter           xcharterbolditalic 
> XCharter-BoldItalic.otf
> xcharterboldslanted   xcharter           xcharterboldslanted 
> XCharter-BoldSlanted.otf
> xcharteritalic        xcharter           xcharteritalic XCharter-Italic.otf
> xchartermath          xchartermath       xchartermath XCharter-Math.otf
> xchartermathbold      xchartermathbold   xchartermathbold 
> XCharter-Math-Bold.otf
> xchartermathmedium    xchartermath       xchartermath XCharter-Math.otf
> xchartermathregular   xchartermath       xchartermath XCharter-Math.otf
> xcharternormal        xcharter           xcharteritalic XCharter-Italic.otf
> xcharterregular       xcharter           xcharterroman XCharter-Roman.otf
> xcharterroman         xcharter           xcharterroman XCharter-Roman.otf
> xcharterslanted       xcharter           xcharterslanted 
> XCharter-Slanted.otf
> 
> and as you can see there is no entry "xcharter". In your case context 
> loaded the bold version of the font but when you use "xcharterroman" as 
> name the document shows the normal upright version.
> 
> >>> - Overpass has a glyph for the ae ligature. Is it normal that it is not 
> >>> used as a ligature for ae?
> >> This seems to be a stupid decision to replace ae by default with a
> >> ligature, maybe dependent on the language but not for all of them.
> > Ok, I've seen it here as (somewhat) common ligature: 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligature_(writing)#Computer_typesetting
> > But there is also mentioned that TeX just has ff, fi, fl, ffi and ffl by 
> > default.
> 
> What is available or not depends on the font and even then there can be 
> differences between different version of a font.
> 
> Wolfgang
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to