Hans Hagen wrote:
what we need is a set of encoding files like
/UniEncoding52 [
....
/uni52DF
/uni52E0
I hate to be negative, but I have doubts about how generic this approach
may be. In some tentative experiments, I discovered that many (most?)
CJK fonts don't use traditional postscript names, but rather map from
unicode to an indexed glyph number.
Fortunately, ttf2tfm's -w [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ notation seems to address this
in most of the old test cases I tried.
adam
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
