Hans Hagen wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The fact that all Polish fonts (lm, iwona, kurier, antt) now ship with >> el-* files makes me wonder: is there time to do the next step and >> finish the second encoding with symbols? >> >> > indeed
Oop. Sorry, I hadn't been watching that. I've suggested texnansi as a starting point, at least within ConTeXt. What symbols do people want that *aren't* within texnansi? (Hint: Here are some symbols present in some Unicode-y fonts, but there's really little pattern to the coverage within "typical" professional fonts: http://homepage.mac.com/atl/tex/UnicodeSymbolDemo.pdf ) -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
