Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> If the batch file is still functionally equivalent, it would
> make sense to include it in the distribution. I vaguely recall
> that I had removed all of the 'smart' stuff from the batch
> file to please command.com, making it much less functional,
> but perhaps that is more an indication of how well I know
> command.com ;-)
>
sure, we can add a working bat file as xxx-win98.bat or so
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
