Arthur Reutenauer schrieb: >> 283-–288 (September 1993) \NC \NR >> ^ >> >> for luatex. it is encoded in iso-latin-1 (emacs says so). > > What's in the file is byte 0x96 (vim is smarter than Emacs!).
I was ignoring any other encoding than iso-latin-9 'til yesterday. So I guess it's more my fault than one of emacs. But maybe I should install vim here (only to test the encodings) ;) > Therefore it cannot be latin-1; I guess it's Windows-1252, which often > pretends to be latin-1. What you're displaying in the line above is > U+2013 EN DASH; it does indeed make sense. > Thanks for the info (also to Tobias), Peter > Arthur > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
