On Jan 6, 2008 12:06 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:32:51 +0100 "Mojca Miklavec" wrote: > > > > I would be enough for me access the glyphs by name, I don't a macro for > > > every character but the list for adobenames should be filled with the > > > information from glyphlist.txt. > > > > > > http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/glyph.html > > > > It is (although I could imagine that it might have been filled with an > > older version of that list, but there are not to many differences > > anyway). > > The only list I found is from 2002, this mean Hans list is from ???
There are two different lists (for new and for "old" fonts) at different versions, one of the latests being. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/aglfn.txt # Name: Adobe Glyph List For New Fonts # Table version: 1.6 # Date: 30 Januaury 2006 I have no idea what exactly is in char-def.lua (perhaps the same as in contextnames.txt, which has been generated from the old list). > > > > Hans, should contextnames.txt be deleted now? So that only one list > > > > will be kept up to date. > > What was this list used for? It has been created in order to clean up the encoding mess a bit (iso-8895-X, cp125X, viscii regimes - most regi-XXX files are autogenerated from that list), but now everthing from that list is in char-def.lua. (And char-def.lua is also used for autogenerating enco-utf, used in XeTeX initialisation.) Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
