On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:21:11 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But after all: there's LinLibertine or the (symbol) Unicode font that >> one of you has mantioned a few days ago. > > yes, those fonts are very complete; i wonder if they may be distributed > with tex ... There's a LaTeX package... Anyway, thnx for mentioning LinLibertine, Wolfgang; downloding it now. Unfortunately they don't have a monospace font :-( For serious utf-8 work in an editor it's indispensable. I'm using Arial Unicode MS in the meantime (ugh). SC Unipad has the best and most complete unicode editing font out there (both mono and var options) but it's a bitmap and tied to the application. SIL has some pretty complete fonts as well. Doulos is pretty complete as far as Latin extensions are concerned, and is probably the richest font after Arial Unicode (which is still over an order of magnitude bigger). But the idea of a virtual uniode font is a good idea and I'd like to help. Best wishes Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid, Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Shi`i Studies Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
