Morgan Brassel wrote: > Hi, > > I think I discovered a bug in the 'num' alternative of the bib module. It > seems to be incompatible with the prefix=+ option of referencing.
Yes, indeed. It is doubtful that it ever will be compatible with prefixes, it needs to do too much black magic behind the scenes. > > By the way, the 'num' alternative also gives an unknow reference when > \completepublications is not present, while the default alternative is OK. Is > there a particular reason for this? Thanks. Yes. You are asking for the sequence number in the list of publications. That is (by definition) undefined if there is no such list (yet). Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
